New here, but I don't belong.

pooleo said:
depends on what kind of info. I was the proud owner of a 67 f-100 ranger a few years ago.
Click to expand...

I was looking for lower info, fuel tank capacity. I have a step side and most of the books show 19.2 gal. but, my tank is not that big. I think it might be a 12 gal. It has a 351M and I'm going through a 1/4 tank in about 20-30 miles. I think I calculated 10.7 miles per gal.

Ed
 
Last edited:
thats about right for a 351m. Thats a 351 in the 400 block. Its a slow torque monster that drinks fuel. Stroke on that beast is like 7" or something.

They basically took the crank from the small block windsor and "de-stroked" it to put in the 400 block. That motor is a work horse. Should be left for farm work. :eek:

I had the 352 FE in mine. Thing got about 7 mpg. But had insane hp and torque numbers.
 
pooleo said:
thats about right for a 351m. Thats a 351 in the 400 block. Its a slow torque monster that drinks fuel. Stroke on that beast is like 7" or something.

They basically took the crank from the small block windsor and "de-stroked" it to put in the 400 block. That motor is a work horse. Should be left for farm work. :eek:

I had the 352 FE in mine. Thing got about 7 mpg. But had insane hp and torque numbers.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I'm hoping down the road, I can get alittle more out of it.

Thanks,

Ed
 
2011-12-26_13-49-15_310.jpg

2011-12-26_13-48-11_425.jpg

2011-12-26_13-47-48_843.jpg


I'll have to get a couple more recent shots for y'all. I've got new tires and the bumpers on it now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top